Cases 1 - 10 of 452
Rutledge et al v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R and A D R
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP, League of Women Voters of Alabama, League of Women Voters of Alabama Education Fund and others
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, William R Adair, T Kirke Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nairne v. Landry
as 24-30115
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Nairne, Doctor, Clee E. Lowe, Reverend, Alice Washington, Doctor and others
Defendant:
Nancy Landry, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of Louisiana
Intervenor:
State of Louisiana, by and through Attorney General Elizabeth B. Murrill, Phillip DeVillier, in his official official capacity as Speaker of the Louisiana House of Representative, Cameron Henry, in his official capacity as President of the Louisiana Senate and others
NAACP v. Tindell
as 23-60647
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, NAACP, Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Mississippi NAACP, Jackson City Branch of the NAACP, Jackson NAACP and others
Defendant:
Sean Tindell, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Public Safety, Bo Luckey, in his official capacity as Chief of the Mississippi Department of Public Safety Office of Capitol Police, Lynn Fitch, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and others
James-Irvin et al v. Buffalo Police Department, et al
as 2:2023cv01237
Plaintiff:
Keita M. James-Irvin, William W. Morris Jr. and Jazmin Morris
Defendant:
Buffalo Police Department, Alvin Robinson, Pete Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP et al v. BERGER, et al
as 1:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, COMMON CAUSE, MITZI REYNOLDS TURNER and others
Defendant:
PHILIP BERGER, TIMOTHY MOORE, DESTIN HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971 Voting Rights Act
Pennsylvania State Conference of NAACP Branches, et al v. Northampton County Board of Elections, et al
as 23-3166
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES, LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS EMPOWER AND REBUILD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Not Yet Classified:
RICHARD MARINO, DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, BRYAN CUTLER, KIM WARD and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee:
THE PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT and SENIORLAW CENTER
Swartz v. Democratic Party et al
as 4:2023cv06068
Plaintiff:
Jesse F. Swartz
Defendant:
The Democratic Party, The Black Caucus, NAACP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. IRS et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Williams
Defendant:
IRS, NAACP Representatives, NAACP Administrater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disability Rights Florida, et al v. Secretary, State of Florida, et al
as 23-13727
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, VOTE.ORG, FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY, STATE OF FLORIDA, SUPERVISOR, ELECTIONS FOR ALACHUA COUNTY, SUPERVISOR, ELECTIONS FOR BAKER COUNTY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
