Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 476
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice
as 25-1032
Defendant: SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE and EDEN HENDRICK, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice
Plaintiff: SOUTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, JUSTICE 360 and DISABILITY RIGHTS SOUTH CAROLINA
Crookshanks et al v. Elizabeth School District
as 1:2024cv03512
Plaintiff: Mindy Smith, Authors Guild, The, NAACP--Colorado--Montana--Wyoming State Area Conference and others
Defendant: Elizabeth School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
MCCLARY v. REYNOLDS et al
as 1:2024cv11259
Defendant: PATRICIA A. HAYEK, SHAVONNE DAVIS, RICHARD E. MCKELVEY and others
Plaintiff: JAMES W. MCCLARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RNC v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-2045
Intervenor: DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Defendant: KEVIN N. LEWIS, in their official capacities as Members of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, SIOBHAN O'DUFFY MILLEN, in their official capacities as Members of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, KAREN BRINSON BELL, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff: NORTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Amicus Curiae: NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, JACKSON SAILOR JONES and BERTHA LEVERETTE
RNC v. North Carolina State Board of Elections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 24-2044
Plaintiff: NORTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Defendant: KAREN BRINSON BELL, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, SIOBHAN O'DUFFY MILLEN, in their official capacities as Members of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Intervenor: DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Amicus Curiae: JACKSON SAILOR JONES, NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP and BERTHA LEVERETTE
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA et al v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2024cv00412
Defendant: CORD BYRD and RON DESANTIS
Plaintiff: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA EDUCATION FUND INC, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE NAACP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv04546
Plaintiff: New Georgia Project, Inc., Georgia Coalition for the Peoples Agenda, Inc. and Georgia State Conference of the NAACP
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger and Brian Kemp
Intervenor: Republican National Committee and Georgia Republican Party, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 20501 National Voter Registration Act
Quinn et al v. Raffensperger
as 1:2024cv04364
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger
Plaintiff: William T. Quinn and David Cross
Intervenor: Black Voters Matter Fund, Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, Georgia Coalition for the People's Agenda, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 20501 National Voter Registration Act
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP, et al v. Attorney General, State of Alabama
as 24-13111
Plaintiff: GREATER BIRMINGHAM MINISTRIES, ALABAMA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF ALABAMA EDUCATION FUND and others
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Unknown: SERVICE
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF TEXAS and others
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Raffensperger
as 1:2024cv04287
Plaintiff: Georgia Coalition for the People's Agenda, Inc. and Georgia State Conference of the NAACP
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger
Intervenor: Georgia Republican Party, Inc. and Republican National Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?