Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Donald Nicodemus v. City of South Bend, et al
as 24-1099
Plaintiff:
DONALD NICODEMUS
Defendant:
CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA and STATE OF INDIANA
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL PRESS PHOTOGRAPHERS ASSOCIATION and 5 NEWS MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS
NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv00745
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER and ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
ROB RAWSON, ROSEMARIE HOWELL and TROY LAW, PLLC
Petitioner:
JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, DON KOZICH, REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS and others
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF ALTERNATIVE NEWS MEDIA, TULLY CENTER FOR FREE SPEECH, THOMAS BRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Jane Sullivan, et al v. University of Washington, et al
as 23-35313
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE SULLIVAN and P. POES, 1-75; Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, a Washington public corporation and ELIZA SAUNDERS, Director of Public Records and Open Public Meetings, University of Washington
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CALIFORNIANS AWARE, FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION and others
Arizona Broadcasters Association et al v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2022cv01431
Plaintiff:
Arizona Broadcasters Association, American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona, Arizona Newspapers Association and others
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Rachel Mitchell and Paul Penzone
Amicus Curiae:
Central Arizona NLG, Southern Arizona NLG, Mass Liberation AZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VHT, Inc. v. Zillow Group, Inc., et al
as 22-35200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VHT, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
ZILLOW GROUP, INC., a Washington corporation and ZILLOW, INC., a Washington corporation
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL PRESS PHOTOGRAPHERS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PHOTOGRAPHIC ARTISTS, THE GRAPHIC ARTIST GUILD, PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHERS OF AMERICA, NORTH AMERICAN NATURE PHOTOGRAPHERS, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MEDIA PHOTOGRAPHERS, AND DIGITAL MEDIA LICENSING ASSOCI
Martinez et al v. The City of Fresno
as 1:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
Desiree Martinez, Fresno Homeless Union, Faith in the Valley and others
Defendant:
The City of Fresno
Amicus Curiae:
First Amendment Coalition, California News Publishers Association, Californians Aware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VHT, Inc. v. Zillow Group, Inc., et al
as 22-35147
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VHT, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
ZILLOW GROUP, INC., a Washington corporation and ZILLOW, INC., a Washington corporation
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL PRESS PHOTOGRAPHERS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PHOTOGRAPHIC ARTISTS, THE GRAPHIC ARTIST GUILD, PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHERS OF AMERICA, NORTH AMERICAN NATURE PHOTOGRAPHERS, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MEDIA PHOTOGRAPHERS, AND DIGITAL MEDIA LICENSING ASSOCI
Natl Press Photographers v. McCraw
as 22-50337
Plaintiff / Appellee:
National Press Photographers Association, Texas Press Association and Joseph Pappalardo
Defendant / Appellant:
Steven McCraw, in his official capacity as Director of theTexas Department of Public Safety, Dwight Mathis, in his official capacity as Chief of the Texas Highway Patrol and Wes Mau, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Hayes County, Texas
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google LLC
as 17-1118
Amicus Curiae:
STEVE WOZNIAK, AMERICAN PHOTOGRAPHIC ARTISTS, JOSEPH SCOTT MILLER and others
Defendant / Cross Appellant:
GOOGLE LLC and GOOGLE INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
Juan Machado Amadis v. DOS, et al
as 19-5088
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice and United States Department of State
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Juan Luciano Machado Amadis
Amicus Curiae:
Investigative Reporting Workshop, Reuters News & Media Inc., ProPublica and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
