Cases 1 - 10 of 244
Jansons v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
Neal Jansons
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Neal v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Gloria Shanay Neal
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Neal v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
Kaelyn Neal
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nelson v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv02861
Plaintiff:
Tre'Shaune Olly Neal and Tasha Nelson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Anderson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Patrick Neal Anderson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kelly v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06234
Plaintiff:
Neal Kelly
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kelly v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Neal Kelly
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nesbitt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Princeton Neal Nesbitt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Soechting v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
Michael Neal Soechting
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Bennett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00075
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Neal Bennett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
