Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Nettles v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00980
Petitioner:
Donovan Nettles and Donavan Nettles
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. Barton
as 24-30038
Plaintiff:
Dumauriea L. McGee
Defendant:
Trent Barton, Assistant Warden, Marcus Jones, Major, Gabriel Hebert, Major and others
Jarvis v. Cain et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Defendant:
Nathaniel Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01672
Plaintiff:
Corey Marquee Adams
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Corrections, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Tim Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Barton
as 23-30458
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dumauriea L. McGee
Defendant / Appellee:
Trent Barton, Assistant Warden, Marcus Jones, Major, Gabriel Hebert, Major and others
Williams v. Nettles
as 23-30347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reginald Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
John Doe Nettles, Warden, Mark LaPrairie, Warden, John Doe Jack, Major and others
Edwards v. Rheems
as 23-30109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Antoine Edwards
Defendant / Appellee:
Luke Rheems, Colonel, Nettle, Warden, Simon, Colonel and others
Jarvis v. Cain et al
as 4:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L Jarvis
Defendant:
Nathial Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Defendant:
Nathial Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nettles v. Garrido
as 1:2022cv00575
Petitioner:
Carl G Nettles
Respondent:
F J Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
