Cases
Christopher Rutledge v. FBI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 25-6592
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER R. RUTLEDGE
Defendant: FBI, DARPA, (Defense Advance Research Project Agency), DUKE UNIVERSITY, Medical Center Research, Department Psychology and Neuroscience, and their Biotechnologies, Neurotechnologies Activities Oversight Boards and others
Bastien et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv06944
Defendant: Neurotechnology Companies, Young Money Entertainment and United States of America
Plaintiff: Jahkim Bastien and Jahwarnz Bastien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Imageware Systems, Inc. v. Fulcrum Biometrics, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00936
Plaintiff: Imageware Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Fulcrum Biometrics, LLC, Neurotechnology and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Blue Spike, LLC v. Fulcrum Biometrics, LLC et al
as 6:2012cv00610
Plaintiff: Blue Spike, LLC
Defendant: Fulcrum Biometrics, LLC and NEUROtechnology
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Blue Spike, LLC v. Texas Instruments, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv00499
Consolidated Defendant: Precise Biometrics AB, Sonda Technologies, Ltd., Technicolor USA, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant: Soundcloud Ltd., TuneSat, LLC, Zeitera, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court: David Folsom and Scott Woloson
Counter Defendant: L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc., Scott A. Moskowitz and Blue Spike, Inc.
Defendant: Ensequence, Inc. and Anviz Global, Inc.
Plaintiff: Blue Spike, LLC
Special Master: Francis McGovern
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ARISTOCRAT TECH V INTL GAME TECH We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1016
Plaintiff-Appellant: Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. and Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: Director of the Patent and Trademark Office and Neurotechnology Industry Organization
Defendant-Appellee: IGT and International Game Technology

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?