Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
NEVILLE v. URSINO et al
as 2:2026cv06978
Plaintiff: DANIELLE NEVILLE
Defendant: DOMINIC M. URSINO and ROBERT URSINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Sargis v. Pelham Country Club et al
as 7:2026cv07893
Plaintiff: Kyle S. Sargis
Defendant: Pelham Country Club and Rob Neville
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hagen v. Neville et al
as 6:2026cv00414
Plaintiff: Robert Hagen
Defendant: Ryan Glen Neville and Rains County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bruce v. 8th Judicial District Court et al
as 1:2026cv03324
Plaintiff: Robert Franklin Bruce
Defendant: 8th Judicial District Court, Chris Nevils, Public Defenders Office Winn Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruskowski et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2026cv07281
Plaintiff: Kenneth M. Ruskowski, Tina Russak, Salvatore J. Russo and others
Defendant: Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Neville
as 2:2026mc50917
Unknown: Amy Neville
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
CARBON ACTIVATED TIANJIAN COMPANY, LTD. et al v. NEVILLE PETERSON, LLP.
as 1:2026cv02901
Plaintiff: Carbon Activated Tianjian Company, LTD. and Carbon Activated Corp.
Defendant: Neville Peterson, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Neville v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv04844
Plaintiff: Sylvester Fabian Neville
Defendant: Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Evans v. Ward
as 1:2026cv03036
Plaintiff: Neville Evans
Defendant: Brett Matthew Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts
Henderson, Jr. v. Neville, Jr. et al
as 1:2026cv08999
Plaintiff: Tyrelle Motray Henderson, Jr.
Defendant: Chief Justice P. Scott Neville, Jr. and Chief Justice Charles S. Beach II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?