Cases 81 - 90 of 156
Huggins v. 3PMC, LLC, et al
as 4:2016cv00264
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lee Huggins
Defendant:
3PMC, LLC , Headbrands USA, LLC , Claudia Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Newell et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv09665
Plaintiff:
Janice Newell and Jackie Dean Newell
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newell et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv09340
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Newell and Harold Newell
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08941
Plaintiff:
Addie Newell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joaquin Carcano v. Patrick McCrory
as 16-1989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOAQUIN CARCANO, PAYTON GREY MCGARRY, ANGELA GILMORE and others
Plaintiff:
EQUALITY NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK L. MCCRORY, in his official capacity, Governor of North Carolina, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant:
ROY A. COOPER, III, in his official capacity, Attorney General of North Carolina
Intervenor/Defendant:
SENATOR PHILLIP E. BERGER and REPRESENTATIVE TIM MOORE
Womble v. Pure Fishing, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02678
Plaintiff:
John Womble
Defendant:
Pure Fishing, Inc. and Newell Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
NEWELL v. USA
as 1:2016cv00907
Petitioner:
JOSHUA CARDELL NEWELL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Newell v. USA
as 1:2016cv00233
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Warren Rosslyn Newell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Newell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03925
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Newell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Warren Newell
as 16-4178
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WARREN ROSSLYN NEWELL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
