Cases 1 - 10 of 13
BROWN v. MARTOCCIA et al
as 1:2021cv02681
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M. BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN MARTOCCIA, K. NEWLIN and CRUZE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoett Industries, Inc. et al v. Irvine Shade & Door, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00835
Plaintiff:
Stoett Industries, Inc. and Newline International, LLC
Defendant:
Irvine Shade & Door, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
GRAHAM v. KRUEGER et al
as 2:2018cv00276
Defendant:
J. BRADLEY, J. E. KRUEGER, MCCOY and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWLIN v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv04394
Petitioner:
DONALD NEWLIN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MANCINI et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2016cv02048
Plaintiff:
K. C. and MARA MANCINI
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, DOES 1-50, DEBRA DOTSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARLOCK et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2013cv01032
Defendant:
RYAN ASHER, PAUL CIESIELSKI, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. CARLOCK and PATRIC MCDOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
NEWLIN et al v. CONTINENTAL CENTRAL CREDIT, INC.
as 1:2013cv00312
Defendant:
CONTINENTAL CENTRAL CREDIT, INC.
Plaintiff:
JAY NEWLIN and MANDA NEWLIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Newlin v. Comcast Cable of Indiana Inc
as 2:2012cv00430
Plaintiff:
John R Newlin
Defendant:
Comcast Cable of Indiana Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Newlin et al
as 2:2012cv00131
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Newlin and World Changers Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
World Changers Incorporated et al v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv00026
Plaintiff:
World Changers Incorporated and John Newlin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
