Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Keohohou et al v. North American Derivatives Exchange, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv20996
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Evans
Defendant:
Foris DAX, Inc., Does 1-20 and North American Derivatives Exchange, Inc. doing business as Crypto.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Mark Gooding v. Nicholas Evans, et al
as 25-1785
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY GOODING
Defendant:
NICHOLAS EVANS, MICHAEL RAMELIS, STEPHEN ENNIS and others
Benshoof, et al. v. Chin, et al.
as 25-4669
Plaintiff:
KURT BENSHOOF, BRETT FOUNTAIN and URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
ANDREA CHIN, ANTHONY BELGARD, DONOVAN BROUSSARD and others
Gooding v. Evans et al
as 2:2024cv12097
Defendant:
Smith, Nicholas Evans, Otto and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Gooding
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Evans v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Evans
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Debose v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2021cv02240
Plaintiff:
Terrance Debose
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County, Cuyahoga County Council, Armond D Budish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Evans v. USA
as 4:2021cv01219
Petitioner:
Nicholas Evans
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lorinzo Sampson v. Cty of Cleveland, OH, et al
as 21-3539
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LITTLE, in his official and individual capacities, CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH, BARRY HICKERSON, in his official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORINZO SAMPSON
Defendant:
TIMOTHY DUGAN, in his official and individual capacities, DONALD HORVAT, in his official and individual capacities, JOHN DOES (9 THROUGH 13) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00666
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
