Cases 1 - 10 of 203
Hemingway v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Hemingway
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc. and Papy Nole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Hemingway v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Hemingway
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Papy Nole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Libel, Assault, Slander
Scelza v. Porter
as 23-7735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN SCELZA
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON PORTER, BRANDON NOLES and LUKE MALONE
Noles v. Allen
as 4:2023cv03629
Plaintiff:
Richard Tyler Noles
Defendant:
Brandi Ann Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
NOLES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01975
Plaintiff:
DAVID E NOLES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NOLE v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2023cv03374
Plaintiff:
LASHAWN NOLE
Defendant:
TYRELL ANTHONY MURRAY and DIDUDEB, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Pace v. Llorens et al
as 3:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
Marvin Pace
Defendant:
A. Llorens, Jessica Putney, David Noles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scelza v. Porter et al
as 2:2023cv05825
Plaintiff:
Michael John Scelza
Defendant:
Jason Porter, Brandon Noles and Luke Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Noles v. United States of America et al (TV1)
as 3:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
James D. Noles, II
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and Deputy Assistant Attorney General doing business as David A. Hubbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
NOLES v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS FACILITY
as 3:2023cv06831
Plaintiff:
LARRY M NOLES
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
