Cases 91 - 100 of 506
Classical Silk, Inc. v. H. Starlet, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv10063
Plaintiff:
Classical Silk, Inc.
Defendant:
South Moon Sales, Inc., DOES 1 through 10, H. Starlet, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. Nordstrom, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00831
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Slutsky et al v. Glow Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07993
Defendant:
Nathan Newman, Natalie Mackey, Glow Concept LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Alana Tyler Slutsky, Inc. and Alana Tyler Slutsky
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Marcktell v. Nordstrom, Inc.
as 1:2020cv07934
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ayala Marcktell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Klauber Brothers, Inc. v. Australian Fashion Labels Ltd. et al
as 2:2020cv07477
Defendant:
ASOS.com Ltd., BNKR Online Pty Ltd., Nordstrom, Inc a Washington corporation, individually doing business as Nordstrom Rack and others
Plaintiff:
Klauber Brothers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Klauber Brothers, Inc. v. Urban Outfitters, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv07430
Defendant:
Zappos IP LLC, Zappos IP, Inc., Does 1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Klauber Brothers, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Eminent, Inc., Zappos.com LLC and BOP LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Chaisson-Ricker v. Nordstrom, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00598
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Chaisson-Ricker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv08380
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
1700 Chestnut Street LLC v. NORDSTROM INC.
as 2:2020cv02860
Plaintiff:
1700 Chestnut Street LLC
Defendant:
NORDSTROM INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv80892
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
