Cases 21 - 30 of 46
PHILLIPS v. NAPHCARE, INC., ET AL.
as 1:2018cv00974
Defendant:
MICHAEL VAN SICKLE, IVY MANNING, AMY JO ROSENTHAL and others
Plaintiff:
ROBIN DENISE PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoiness v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00358
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Hoiness
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Abdul Jalaludeen and Katie Cartwright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNair v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2017cv00458
Plaintiff:
DeAndre McNair
Defendant:
Nurse Mitchell and Naphcare Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
Thugarella Burgess
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Nsekenene Kolongo, M.D., Hampton Roads Regional Jail Authority ("HRRJA") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roxanne Adams v. Debra Ferguson
as 17-1484
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROXANNE ADAMS, Administrator of the Estate of Jamycheal M. Mitchell, Deceased
Defendant - Appellant:
DEBRA K. FERGUSON, Licensed Clinical Psychologist
Defendant:
NAPHCARE, INC., NSEKENENE KOLONGO, MD, RENEE EDWARDS, LCSW and others
Andrews v. Woody et al
as 3:2017cv00167
Plaintiff:
Benjamin M. Andrews
Defendant:
C. T. Woody , John/Jane Doe(s) Jail Staff, Naphcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Godall et al
as 2:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Dedric Morris
Defendant:
Captain Godall, Sgt. Robinson and Naphcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill Myrick v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00952
Plaintiff:
Brenda L. Hill Myrick
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Khairul Emran, Donna Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cowart v. Jamaludeen et al
as 1:2016cv01305
Plaintiff:
Troy David Cowart
Defendant:
Abdul Jamaludeen, Yolanda Vines and NaphCare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter Green v. NaphCare
as 16-7058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER LEE GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
NAPHCARE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
