Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Baraiac v. Headhunter Bow Strings, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Narci Baraiac
Defendant:
Headhunter Bow Strings, Inc. and Headhunter Strings, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Approximately Thirteen Pit Bull-Type Dogs Seized From 362 Narcy Stafford Road Glenville, Georgia
as 2:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately Thirteen Pit Bull-Type Dogs Seized From 362 Narcy Stafford Road Glenville, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. Novack
as 13-953
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Denis Ramirez and Joel Gonzalez
Defendant - Appellant:
Narcisa Veliz Novack, AKA Narcy Novack and Cristobal Veliz
United States of America v. Novack (Veliz)
as 13-914
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Narcisa Veliz Novack, AKA Narcy Novack, Denis Ramirez and Joel Gonzalez
Defendant - Appellant:
Cristobal Veliz
Baez v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv05329
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Orquila Baez Obo Narcis Baez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
USA v. Bilc et al
as 8:2011mj00521
Defendant:
Emanuel Andrei Bilc (1), Narcis Stefan Margaian (2) and Ioan Adrian Purcea (3)
Plaintiff:
USA
Narcie Holley, et al. v. A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-82653
Defendant:
A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont
Plaintiff:
Narcie Holley
HOLLEY v. A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv82653
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HOLLEY and NARCIE HOLLEY
Defendant:
A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
