Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Johnson v. Saul
as 1:2019cv03284
Plaintiff:
Natasha Johnson
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Johnson v. New Season
as 3:2019cv00084
Defendant:
New Season and Desoto County Treatment Center
Plaintiff:
Natasha Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Johnson v. Davis
as 4:2018cv01704
Petitioner:
Natasha Johnson
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YARBOROUGH v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2018cv02688
Plaintiff:
CURTIS J YARBOROUGH
Defendant:
NATASHA JOHNSON , PATRICIA A RISCH , DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF FAMILY DEVELOPMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARLOW v. INT'L PLANNED PARENTHOOD, C.E.O. et al
as 3:2017cv12943
Plaintiff:
CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Defendant:
INT'L PLANNED PARENTHOOD, C.E.O., TRENTON, N.J. PLANNED PARENTHOOD CEO, N.J.M.C. B.O.S.S. WELFARE DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barlow v. Int'l Planned Parenthood, C.E.O. et al
as 1:2017cv09164
Plaintiff:
Clinton C. Barlow, III
Defendant:
Int'l Planned Parenthood, C.E.O., Trenton, N.J. Planned Parenthood CEO, N.J.M.C. B.O.S.S. Welfare Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SPACEAGE CONSULTING CORP. V. PORRINO, et als
as 2:2017cv06299
Plaintiff:
SPACEAGE CONSULTING CORP.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER S. PORRINO, ESSEX COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, HUDSON COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MALHAN v. KERRY et al
as 2:2016cv08495
Plaintiff:
SURENDER MALHAN
Defendant:
JOHN KERRY, CHRISTOPHER S. PORRINO, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv03150
Plaintiff:
Natasha Johnson
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
