Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Lehmann v. Lee, et al.
as 24-6544
Defendant:
ELON MUSK, SOUSANNA LEE, PAUL SUTIN and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN DANIEL LEHMANN
Lehmann v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv02107
Plaintiff:
Nathan Daniel Lehmann
Defendant:
Sousanna "Tes" Lee, Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
BARTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11996
Plaintiff:
NATHAN DANIEL BARTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09722
Plaintiff:
NATHAN DANIEL HOGAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18281
Plaintiff:
NATHAN DANIEL MORAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Daniels v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00162
Petitioner:
Nathan Daniels
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00714
Plaintiff:
NATHAN DANIEL COOK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SPLETZER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04393
Plaintiff:
NATHAN DANIEL SPLETZER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferr v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2021cv08092
Plaintiff:
Nathan Daniel Ferr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ronnau v. Fort Madison State Penitentiary
as 4:2021cv00120
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Petitioner:
Nathan Daniel Ronnau
Respondent:
Fort Madison State Penitentiary and Thomas Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
