Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Salazar et al v. Board of Regents of the New Mexico Military Institute et al
as 1:2020cv01029
Counter Defendant:
M.S.
Defendant:
John Doe, John Roe, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ricki Leigh Salazar and Ronnie Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Giles v. Bolling et al
as 4:2020cv01036
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Ronald England, Gary Malone and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Giles, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. Smith et al
as 3:2019cv02035
Defendant:
Nathan Giles, Dale Smith and Janet Smith
Plaintiff:
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Giles v. Simpson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00439
Defendant:
Joy Simpson, John H. Merrill, Yvonne Trafford and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. McClellan et al (MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00138
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Giles
Defendant:
Angie McClellan and Deborah Ann Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Giles v. Edwina Hamby, et al
as 17-14192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE NATHAN GILES
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWINA HAMBY, WALTER WILSON and DEWAYNE ESTES
Giles v. Dunn et al
as 4:2017cv00874
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Giles
Defendant:
Jefferson S Dunn, Grantt Culliver, Dewayne Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00275
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Giles
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Grantt Culliver, Dewayne Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Giles v. Crime Stoppers of Birmingham, et al
as 17-11518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE NATHAN GILES
Defendant - Appellee:
CRIME STOPPERS OF BIRMINGHAM ALA. and JEFFERSON COUNTY OWNER OF CRIME STOPPER CARE OF COMPANY UNION
Giles v. Hamby et al
as 4:2016cv00982
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Giles
Defendant:
E Hamby, Wilson, Karen Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
