Cases 21 - 30 of 45
James v. Raybon et al
as 1:2021cv00437
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan James, Jr.
Defendant:
Terry Raybon and Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COATS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv19254
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN JAMES COATS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv16644
Plaintiff:
NATHAN JAMES WOODWARD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Benage v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2021cv00002
Plaintiff:
Nathan James Benage
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Benny Bundy and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORCK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv38834
Plaintiff:
NATHAN JAMES FORCK
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. Raybon et al
as 1:2020cv00299
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan James, Jr.
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RITZO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv09993
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN JAMES RITZO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORTIER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93330
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN JAMES FORTIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melerine v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv11288
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nathan James Melerine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Stauffer v. Newberg et al
as 3:2017cv01295
Defendant:
Officer Carl Busse, Brian Casey, Nathan James and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Stauffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
