Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
FETTERMAN v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2018cv00033
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS DAVID FETTERMAN
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, BRUCE R. ERB, TERRY TOMASSETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARR v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. BARR, JR.
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA , BRUCE R. ERB , TERRY TOMASSETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARR v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv05368
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. BARR, JR.
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, BRUCE R. ERB, TERRY TOMASSETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Assad v. Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00336
Plaintiff:
George Assad
Defendant:
Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., Clayton W. Williams, Jr., Mel G. Riggs and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Poms v. Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00316
Plaintiff:
Nadav Poms
Defendant:
Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. , Clayton W. Williams, Jr. , Jordan R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Sobel v. Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00312
Plaintiff:
Alan Sobel and Nadav Poms
Defendant:
Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. , Clayton W. Williams, Jr. , Mel G Riggs and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Nathan Clouser v. Todd Johnson, et al
as 15-3109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN W. CLOUSER
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD JOHNSON, REGIS VOGLE and JOHN GOSHERT
Lyon v. First Choice Loan Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv04732
Plaintiff:
NATHAN W. LYON
Defendant:
FIRST CHOICE LOAN SERVICES, INC. and FIRST CHOICE BANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Nathan Clouser v. Todd Johnson, et al
as 14-3936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN W. CLOUSER
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD JOHNSON, REGIS VOGLE and JOHN GOSHERT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
