Cases 1 - 10 of 17
General Star Indemnity Company v. Ford et al
as 2:2022cv02890
Plaintiff:
General Star Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Nathaniel Ford and Tail Race Tavern LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07970
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL FORD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv47501
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv34403
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Nathaniel Ford
as 18-1608
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NATHANIEL FORD
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. The Roy Benavidez-Robert Patterson All Airborne Chapter et al
as 3:2014cv00349
Defendant:
Nathaniel Ford, Jose Lopez, The Roy Benavidez-Robert Patterson All Airborne Chapter and others
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
FORD v. USA
as 1:2014cv00291
Petitioner:
HARRY NATHANIEL FORD, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Roy Flugence v. City and County of San Francis, et al
as 13-17529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY FLUGENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSIT AGENCY, NATHANIEL FORD and others
FORD v. USA
as 1:2013cv00781
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
HARRY NATHANIEL FORD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hines v. Ford
as 13-2861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dashon Martel Hines
Defendant - Appellee:
Nathaniel Ford, James G. Giles and Buffalo City Police Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
