Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Phillips v. Youker
as 3:2026cv01024
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Phillips
Defendant:
Chad Youker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rothschild El v. Rothschild, et al.
as 25-7198
Plaintiff:
AMSCHEL ROTHSCHILD EL, Amschel Mayer James Rothschild II and Kondwani Saeed Davis
Defendant:
NATHANIEL MAYER VICTOR ROTHSCHILD, ALEXANDRE DE ROTHSCHILD, ARIANE DE ROTHSCHILD and others
Rothschild El v. Rothschild et al
as 2:2025cv01658
Plaintiff:
Amschel Rothschild El, Amschel Mayer James de Rothschild, II and Kondwani Saeed Davis
Defendant:
Nathaniel Phillip Victor James Rothschild, Emily Magda Freeman-Atwood, Nathaniel Mayer Victor Rothschild and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Braunstein et al v. X Corporation et al
as 1:2025cv10733
Petitioner:
David Braunstein, Anita Patwardhan Butler, Hector G Camargo and others
Respondent:
X Corporation and Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Phillips v. Taz-Ag Inc
as 2:2020cv00131
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Phillips
Defendant:
Taz-Ag Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06375
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Phillips v. Roberts/Roberson et al
as 1:2018cv04869
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Phillips
Defendant:
George Roberts/Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Phillips v. CDCR Director et al
as 2:2018cv04871
Defendant:
CDCR / DAPO, CDCR Director, M. Golz and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Phillips
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
