Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CARSON et al v. THE NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) et al
as 5:2017cv01949
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. CARSON and TOMOKO CARSON
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK), S. CAMPBELL, ADRIAN GIBB DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-5066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan v. National Railroad Passenger Co
as 16-3500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carolyn Jordan
Defendant - Appellee:
Officer, #602, (Amtrak) - National Railroad Passenger Corporation, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, (Amtrak) and Officer R. Joseph, (Amtrak) - National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv11001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Viles v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak") et al
as 1:2015cv00381
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Viles
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak") , Dennis Eichler , Aviv Citron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvia Lacy v. National Railroad Passenger Co
as 15-1013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALVIA L. LACY
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, Amtrak and LARRY TAYLOR
James v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
as 1:2014cv01124
Plaintiff:
Joycelyn V. James
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
