Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Marshall Goldman Motor Sales & Leasing v. Singh
as 1:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Marshall Goldman Motor Sales & Leasing doing business as iBuy Luxury Cars
Defendant:
Navdeep Singh and Amandeep Kaur
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1988 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Bhangu v. Garland
as 23-4224
Petitioner:
NAVDEEP SINGH BHANGU
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund et al v. Gravity Construction, Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv05572
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Gravity Construction, Corp., Navdeep Singh, Ashnu International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Singh v. Garland
as 23-844
Petitioner:
NAVDEEP SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023at00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Torres v. Banga et al
as 4:2021cv01860
Defendant:
Mayha LLC, Gary Express LLC and Navdeep Singh Banga
Plaintiff:
Leondro Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00040
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA Inc et al
as 2:2018cv01028
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc, Jane Doe Singh and others
Plaintiff:
Felicity Wendy Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Archibald v. Singh et al
as 3:2018cv01101
Plaintiff:
Angela Archibald
Defendant:
Navdeep Singh and Orbit Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
