Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Twin City Petroleum & Properties, LLC v. Shah et al
as 3:2024cv00706
Defendant:
Parveen Singh, Sukhvir Singh, Rapid Stores, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Twin City Petroleum & Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Marshall Goldman Motor Sales & Leasing v Singh, et al.
as 1:2024cv01191
Defendant:
Amandeep Kaur and Navdeep Singh
Plaintiff:
Marshall Goldman Motor Sales & Leasing doing business as iBuy Luxury Cars
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1988 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Singh v. Garland
as 24-60293
Petitioner:
Navdeep Singh
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Marshall Goldman Motor Sales & Leasing v. Singh
as 1:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Marshall Goldman Motor Sales & Leasing doing business as iBuy Luxury Cars
Defendant:
Navdeep Singh and Amandeep Kaur
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1988 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Bhangu v. Garland
as 23-4224
Petitioner:
NAVDEEP SINGH BHANGU
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund et al v. Gravity Construction, Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv05572
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Gravity Construction, Corp., Navdeep Singh, Ashnu International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Singh v. Garland
as 23-844
Petitioner:
NAVDEEP SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023at00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
