Cases 1 - 10 of 139
Scranton v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05072
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neil Scranton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Neil Oliver Chisholm v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv08467
Plaintiff:
Neil Oliver Chisholm
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SCUDERI v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv02551
Plaintiff:
NEIL ANGELO SCUDERI
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
El Neil v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
Siham Ibrahim Mohamed El Neil
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Bartoli v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv01945
Plaintiff:
Sheilda Rai Neil Bartoli and Sheilda Rai Neil Bertoli
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cohen v. Social Security
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Larry Neil Cohen
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Neil Washington v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 22-2151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEIL TONY WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Neil Roney v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-2046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEIL DEON RONEY
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting commissioner of Social Security
Wieman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Neil Wieman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
