Cases 11 - 20 of 258
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Huntington Beach, California
as 8:2023cv01972
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireles PCS, LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT and T Mobility
Defendant:
City of Huntington Beach and City of Huntington Beach, California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al v. THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2021cv12306
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC D/B/A AT&T MOBILITY, T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC, NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS and others
Defendant:
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY and THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Interconnection
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Clay County Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
Clay County, Missouri and Clay County Commission
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Lane County, Oregon
as 6:2022cv01635
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, D/B/A AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
Lane County, Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Incorporated Village of Muttontown et al
as 2:2022cv05524
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
The Incorporated Village of Muttontown, The Incorporated Village of Muttontown Board of Trustees, The Planning Board of the Incorporated Village of Muttontown and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Lauren Calabrese, Aldo Calabrese, Tara Rice and others
Intervenor:
Russell McRory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC v. CE-PRO BIKES, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00859
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T MOBILITY
Defendant:
CE-PRO BIKES, LLC doing business as PRO BIKE+ RUN and CE MONROEVILLE22, LP
Cross Defendant:
CE-PRO BIKES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC v. COGECO US (PENN) LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T MOBILITY
Defendant:
COGECO US (PENN) LLC doing business as BREEZELINE, MAICOM SOLUTIONS, LLC doing business as MAICOM LLC and STONEMILE GROUP, LLC
Cross Defendant:
L&J ERECTION, INC., RUTHRAUFF SERVICE, LLC, COGECO US (PENN) LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
CONTROLS SERVICE & ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.
Counter Defendant:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Los Altos
as 22-16432
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DBA AT&T Mobility
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ALTOS, a California municipal corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Planning Board of the Town of Corinth et al
as 1:2021cv00149
Defendant:
The Town of Corinth, The Town of Corinth Building Department and The Planning Board of the Town of Corinth
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Not Classified By Court:
Thomas J. Fucillo
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
