Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC dba AT&T Mobility v. City of Walla Walla We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv05162
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant: City of Walla Walla
Intervenor Defendant: Barbara Knudson and Everett Knudson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. St. Charles County, Missouri et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv01362
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant: St. Charles County, Missouri and St. Charles County Council
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Cable Communication Policy Act
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Clay County Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00642
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant: Clay County, Missouri and Clay County Commission
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC v. CE-PRO BIKES, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00859
Plaintiff: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T MOBILITY
Defendant: CE-PRO BIKES, LLC doing business as PRO BIKE+ RUN and CE MONROEVILLE22, LP
Cross Defendant: CE-PRO BIKES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC v. COGECO US (PENN) LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00727
Plaintiff: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T MOBILITY
Defendant: COGECO US (PENN) LLC doing business as BREEZELINE, MAICOM SOLUTIONS, LLC doing business as MAICOM LLC and STONEMILE GROUP, LLC
Cross Defendant: L&J ERECTION, INC., RUTHRAUFF SERVICE, LLC, COGECO US (PENN) LLC and others
Cross Claimant: CONTROLS SERVICE & ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.
Counter Defendant: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of St. Joseph, Missouri et al
as 5:2023cv06023
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant: City of St. Joseph, Missouri and City Council of the City of St. Joseph, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Village of Oyster Bay Cove, et al
as 2:2022cv07807
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant: The Village of Oyster Bay Cove, The Zoning Board of Appeals of The Village of Oyster Bay Cove and The Planning Board of The Village of Oyster Bay Cove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. Liberal, Kansas, City of et al
as 6:2022cv01264
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant: Liberal, Kansas, City of and City Commission of the City of Liberal, Kansas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Incorporated Village of Muttontown et al
as 2:2022cv05524
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant: The Incorporated Village of Muttontown, The Incorporated Village of Muttontown Board of Trustees, The Planning Board of the Incorporated Village of Muttontown and others
Intervenor Defendant: Lauren Calabrese, Aldo Calabrese, Tara Rice and others
Intervenor: Russell McRory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Hartford
as 3:2021cv01609
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant: City of Hartford

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?