Cases 11 - 20 of 236
Nolan v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02093
Plaintiff:
Edwin Nolan
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meinke et al v. Stammitti et al
as 1:2023cv01175
Plaintiff:
Nolan P. Meinke and Jose Romero
Defendant:
Sheriff Philip R. Stammitti, Captain Hammond Jack, Administrator James Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Barbieri et al v. Jeitschko et al
as 1:2023cv00525
Plaintiff:
Nathan Barbieri and Nolan Radomski
Defendant:
Thomas Jeitschko, Judith Whipple and Amy Wisner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00722
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Summit Tool Company 401(K) Retirement Plan et al v. Essman et al
as 1:2023cv00698
Defendant:
Danielle Essman, Danielle L. Romstadt, Mason Romstadt and others
Plaintiff:
Summit Tool Company 401(K) Retirement Plan and Summit Tool Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Nolan et al v. Wetzel et al
as 2:2023cv00895
Plaintiff:
Kathryn L. Nolan and Ann Vosburg
Defendant:
Richard D. Wetzel, Kathy Smedley, Paul John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Kyles v. Oakland, County of et al
as 2:2022cv12973
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kyles
Defendant:
Oakland County, a political subdivision of the State of Michigan, City of Pontiac, a municipal corporation, Stewart Trepte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lorne Carter v. Michael Klenner, et al
as 22-1989
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORNE CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL KLENNER, NOLAN PRZYBYLO, DAVID BELLESTRI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
