Cases 71 - 80 of 976
Nolan Cyre v. USA
as 23-35341
Petitioner / Appellant:
NOLAN PAUL CYRE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Forbes v. Whittington et al
as 5:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
Nolan Ryan Forbes
Defendant:
Julian Whittington, Linton Jacobs, Anthony Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Justin James Eugene Clark and Lilly Faith Clark
Defendant:
John Galipeau, Garry Lewis, Rojo and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Partain et al
as 4:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Marcus Harrison
Defendant:
H. Partain, Cpl P. Hollie, Sgt D. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Jeffrey Nines
as 23-6317
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JEFFREY NINES, RONALD STOTLER, Chief of Security and MS. SHARON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Nolan v. Haley, et al
as 23-1098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CHAD NOLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN HALEY, JACE MCCALL, THE 16TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Nolan v. Nines et al
as 1:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Nolan
Defendant:
Warden Jeff Nines, Correctional Officer Keith Markle and Asst. Warden Keith Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. HICKS et al
as 1:2023cv01752
Plaintiff:
SIVAJI HALL
Defendant:
MARCUS O. HICKS, BRUCE DAVIS, JAMES STIGLIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
