Cases 51 - 60 of 219
Shaw v. H&M International Transportation, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02629
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and H&M International Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eric Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2019cv02077
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Kyle F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Hoover v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (TV2)
as 3:2019cv00250
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hoover
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Buchanan v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2019cv00262
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Arthur v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (PLR2)
as 3:2019cv00249
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
James Arthur
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Brewer et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 2:2019cv01766
Defendant:
David Patterson, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Professional Transportation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Penny Brewer and Dominic Brewer
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Fultz v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2019cv00952
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Eli Fultz
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Diekman v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2019cv00431
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Diekman
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Curtis v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (JRG1)
as 1:2019cv00102
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Randy Curtis
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Lambert v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, et al.
as 3:2019cv00317
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Lambert
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Pennsylvania Lines, LLC, Norfolk Southern Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
