Cases 71 - 80 of 105
Pick v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2014cv00376
Plaintiff:
John L Pick
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GLISTA et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2014cv00380
Plaintiff:
DONALD A. GLISTA and WILLIAM L. ORR
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 3102
Jacobs v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jacobs
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jacobs v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 4:2014cv00318
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jacobs
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MULLEN v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2013cv06348
Plaintiff:
HARRY MULLEN
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 3102
GLISTA et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2013cv04668
Plaintiff:
DONALD A. GLISTA and WILLIAM L. ORR
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 3102 Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations Act
Lee v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Charles T. Lee
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Brotherhood of Maintenance of v. Norfolk Southern Railway Compa
as 12-3416
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES DIVISION/IBT
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Brotherhood of Maintenance of v. Norfolk Southern Railway Compa
as 12-3415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES DIVISION/IBT
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Parsley v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2012cv01272
Plaintiff:
Gregory Parsley
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
