Cases 1 - 10 of 31
North American Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Patrick Nelson et al
as 8:2024mc00034
Defendant:
Patrick Nelson and Brian Nelson
Plaintiff:
North American Savings Bank, F.S.B.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Siantou v. North American Savings Bank
as 1:2024cv00725
Defendant:
North American Savings Bank
Plaintiff:
Stephane Siantou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wicker v. North American Savings Bank, FSB
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Tracy Wicker
Defendant:
North American Savings Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
N Amer Svngs Bank v. Nelson
as 23-60363
Plaintiff / Appellee:
North American Savings Bank, F.S. B. and North American Savings Bank, F.S.B.
Defendant / Appellant:
Patrick Nelson
Meadows v. North American Savings Bank et al
as 4:2022cv00790
Plaintiff:
Diane Meadows
Defendant:
North American Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
United States of America v. Brown et al
as 2:2022cv02449
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Philip S. Brown, Amber L. Brown, Johnson County, Kansas and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
US v. Foistner
as 22-1619
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH FOISTNER
Interested Party:
NEWTEK SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC, NORTH AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B., CELTIC BANK and others
US v. Foistner
as 22-1420
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH FOISTNER
Interested Party:
NEWTEK SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC and NORTH AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B.
North American Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Nelson et al
as 3:2021cv00184
Plaintiff:
North American Savings Bank, F.S.B.
Defendant:
Patrick Nelson and Brian Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
