Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Rogers v. Massachusetts Partnership for Correctional Health Care, LLC (MPCH) et al
as 1:2017cv11366
Plaintiff:
Jessie Rogers
Defendant:
Massachusetts Partnership for Correctional Health Care, LLC (MPCH), Massachusetts Department of Correction, Sally Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garrett v. Sulser et al
as 6:2017cv00310
Plaintiff:
Christopher Garrett
Defendant:
Kimberly Sulser, Virginia Schafer, Paul Schrode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Santangelo Vincent
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grantt Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conrad v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Conrad
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grant Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrier v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00104
Plaintiff:
Rodney Farrier
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grant Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanton v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Stanton
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grant Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00103
Plaintiff:
Joseph Marco Jackson
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grant Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00097
Plaintiff:
Roderick Williams
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grant Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Stewart et al
as 1:2017cv00086
Plaintiff:
Ronald Martin
Defendant:
Cynthia Stewart, Terry Raybon, C. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maddox v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02083
Plaintiff:
Mannie Maddox
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Paul Talbot, Mary Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
