Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Anderson v. Boyd
as 6:2019cv00033
Plaintiff:
Michael O. Anderson, II
Defendant:
Dustin Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Smith et al
as 6:2018cv00348
Defendant:
FNU Cordona, J. Bartlett, Louis Cortez and others
Plaintiff:
Michael O. Anderson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Kiser
as 1:2018cv01260
Respondent:
Jeffrey Kiser
Petitioner:
Kentray Devon Bailey
Interested Party:
Jonn O. Iweanoge, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Seven C's Properties L L C et al v. Kinetica Energy Express L L C et al
as 2:2018cv00804
Plaintiff:
Seven Cs Properties L L C , Stoebner Enterprises L L C , Martin O Miller II L L C and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co L L C , Kinetica Partners L L C , Tennessee Gas Transmission Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Peters v. Lorie Davis, et al
as 18-40566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GEOFFREY PETERS
Defendant - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DEBORAH G. COCKRELL, THOMAS R. TAYLOR and others
Robinson v. Meador et al
as 6:2018cv00207
Plaintiff:
Royal Douglas Robinson
Defendant:
Charles O Meador, II, Deborah G Cockrell, Pam Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Meador et al
as 3:2018cv01143
Plaintiff:
Royal Douglas Robinson
Defendant:
Charles O Meador, II, Deborah G Cockrell, Pam Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briggs v. Davis et al
as 6:2018cv00158
Plaintiff:
Derek L Briggs
Defendant:
Laura Davis, Adam D Dotson, Charles O Meador, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILLIES et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv09579
Plaintiff:
GAIL H. GILLIES and RAY O. GILLIES, II
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
