Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Morris v. Haines et al
as 3:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Leon A. Morris
Defendant:
Major Haines, Montgomery County Jail, Captain J. Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ray v. Bingham et al
as 6:2021cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jerremy Ray
Defendant:
Matt Bingham, Bryan Jiral, O W Loyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anduze v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv00519
Defendant:
Capt. Loiseau, Captain Bernard Mathis, CO Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Johmanni Anduze
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
ADW Blair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall, James v. Wilfong et al
as 3:2020cv00089
Defendant:
Capt. Wirth, H. Stensrud, C/O W. Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
James Randall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Cherry et al
as 3:2019cv00608
Defendant:
Sgt. S. Cherry and c/o W. Young
Plaintiff:
James Alexander Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gulbronson v. Martell et al
as 3:2015cv01910
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Gulbronson and Conrad E. Gulbronson
Defendant:
c/o M. Narvaez, c/o Garza, Anderson, LCSW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Moody v. Lee et al
as 3:2013cv02745
Plaintiff:
Darryl Moody
Defendant:
Chad Lee, Michael Emfinger, Hilton Griffen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Roberts et al
as 3:2012cv00960
Plaintiff:
Waldo T. Lopez
Defendant:
Sgt. J. Roberts, c/o W. Terrell, c/o A. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Tarpley v. J. Stouffer
as 11-7498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN E. TARPLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner, FREDERICK NASTRI, BOBBY SHEARIN and others
Defendant:
CHARLENE HETTY TRENUM and ISAIS TESSEMA
Steven Tarpley v. Charlene Trenum
as 11-6767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN E. TARPLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLENE HETTY TRENUM and ISAIS TESSEMA
Defendant:
J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner, DAVID BARTHALOW, FREDERICK NASTRI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
