Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Islas v. DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel-ATD
as 3:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
Jose Martin Islas
Respondent:
DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel-ATD
Islas v. DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel-ATD
as 1:2022cv04667
Petitioner:
Jose Martin Islas
Respondent:
DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel-ATD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
William Himchak, III v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 22-2947
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. HIMCHAK, III
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, ALAN ROBINSON, Office of Chief Counsel, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Kirchner v. Kauffman et al
as 1:2021cv01200
Petitioner:
Scott Kirchner
Respondent:
Kevin Kauffman, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, District Attorney of Lebanon County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TALLEY v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00308
Defendant:
LT. COLLINS, DORINA VARNER, GOVENOR TOM WOLFE and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Olery v. DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel
as 0:2018cv03269
Respondent:
DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel
Petitioner:
Gael Aburu Olery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, SECURITY OFFICE and OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mounkassa v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2017cv05105
Petitioner:
Adolphe Mounkassa
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security, US immigration and Custom Enforcement and The Office of Chief Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CARTER v. KANE et al
as 1:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN V. COLEMAN, JAMES C. BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
