Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Youngblood v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2023cv04443
Plaintiff:
Alaya Youngblood
Defendant:
City Of New York, Louis Molina, Captain Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Sarah Weiss
as 22-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, JOHN MEADORS, BARNEY GIESE, all three individually for damages arising from malicious prosecution and for qui tam recovery and others
ANDREWS v. CORRECTION OFFICER DEJESUS
as 2:2021cv02160
Defendant:
CORRECTION OFFICER DEJESUS
Plaintiff:
AARON ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. DeJesus et al
as 1:2019cv04638
Defendant:
Ann Marie Troy, Sen. Parole Off. Santiago, Parole Officer DeJesus and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Tandy Carter
as 17-1672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
TANDY CARTER, individually for damages for qui tam recovery, BARBARA JEAN BURNS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery and others
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Tandy Carter
as 14-2258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA JEAN BURNS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, GINGLIAT, BETTIS AND SAVITZ LAW FIRM, THE, in its corporate capacity, for damages and for qui tam recovery and others
Crumpler v. DeJesus et al
as 5:2014ct03263
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Crumpler
Defendant:
Officer DeJesus, E. Gaskins and Officer Hardison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIA v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
as 1:2010cv01563
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA A. GARCIA
Defendant:
CITY OF VINELAND , OFFICER MASLANICH , OFFICER SCARPA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
