Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Haynes, Marquise v. Sergeant Dixon et al
as 1:2024cv20880
Plaintiff:
Marquise Haynes
Defendant:
Sergeant Dixon, Officer Vasquez, Officer Triplet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
HERBERT GRAY
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, ESQ., PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh v. Santa Clara County Correction Department et al
as 3:2021cv06723
Plaintiff:
Darryl E. Pugh
Defendant:
Santa Clara County Correction Department, Sgt. L. Anderson, Officer Ryan Kimber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kalu v. Love et al
as 1:2021cv22956
Plaintiff:
John Oscar Kalu
Defendant:
Officer Dennis Love, Officer Javrant Love, Officer Billy Witherspoon and others
Malik Abdullah v. Philadelphia Police Department, et al
as 19-1865
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALIK ABDULLAH
Defendant / Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CEARA HOLMES, PPD OFFICER WILSON, #1490 and others
Johnson v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2018cv01568
Plaintiff:
Antonio Andrea Johnson
Defendant:
Ed Gonzales, Officer Hill, Officer Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dameon Lamont Powell v. Widley et al
as 2:2017cv00675
Defendant:
Correctional Sergant T. C. Davies, Correctional Sergant T. C. Davies, Correctional Officer Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Dameon Lamont Powell
Mobasser v. City of Webster, Texas et al
as 4:2015cv00427
Defendant:
The City of Webster,Texas, P J Behler, Collin Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Mani Mobasser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Doe et al
as 1:2012cv10054
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wilkins
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Superintendent of DIV # 2, Ms. Bracy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Vasquez
as 6:2012cv01845
Plaintiff:
Shamond Byrd
Defendant:
Officer Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
