Cases 1 - 10 of 662
Oswald v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65357
Plaintiff:
Randy Oswald
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sandra RumanekIn re: Sandra Rumanek
as 24-1634
Petitioner:
In re: SANDRA RUMANEK and DR. OLGA A. KATZ
Respondent:
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL MANAGEMENT INC, SHERRY R. FALLON, DAVID G. CULLEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Son Oswald Cesar v. Dept of Justice
as 2:2024cv02433
Petitioner:
Son Oswald Cesar
Respondent:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Valdez v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
Norma Flores Valdez
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Nicholas Oswald, Brandon Grissom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De Jaray, et al. v. Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
as 24-1695
Plaintiff:
PERIENNE DE JARAY, STEVEN A.W DE JARAY, APEX-MICRO MANUFACTURING CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
De Jaray, et al. v. Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
as 24-1693
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A.W DE JARAY, APEX-MICRO MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, PERIENNE DE JARAY and others
Defendant:
LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, an Oregon-headquartered Delaware corporation
McPherson v. Hill et al
as 6:2024cv06164
Petitioner:
Oswald McPherson
Respondent:
Superintendent Hill and DOCCS Commissioner Martuscello, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cesar v. Department of Justice
as 6:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Son Oswald Cesar
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Cesar v. Dept. of Justice
as 6:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Son Oswald Cesar
Defendant:
Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
