Cases 1 - 10 of 93
(PC) Quintero v. Lemon et al
as 1:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez Quintero
Defendant:
Tristan Lemon and Oxborrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Quintero v. Lemon et al
as 2:2023cv01719
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez Quintero
Defendant:
Tristan Lemon and Oxborrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Pamplin v. R. Baker, et al
as 22-16952
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DAVID PAMPLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
R. BAKER, dism ECF No. 5, DUGAN, DZURENDA, dism ECF No. 5 and others
(PC) Windham v. Pike et al
as 2:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Charles Windham
Defendant:
Michael Pike, Matthew Swett, Donald Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamal Hendrix v. M. Sharp, et al
as 21-15358
Defendant / Appellee:
ELLIOT BURLEIGH, H. CHUNG, C. DAVIS, Sgt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX, AKA Jamar Hendrix
Joseph Antonetti v. Filson, et al
as 20-16795
Defendant / Appellee:
FOSTER, DEAL, NEVADA BOARD OF PRISON COMMISSIONERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Enoma Igbinovia v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 20-16259
Defendant / Appellee:
CLAUDE WILLIS, BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr., JAMES G. COX and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ENOMA IGBINOVIA
Pamplin v. Baker et al
as 3:2020cv00043
Defendant:
Healer, Oxborrow, Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
John David Pamplin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamal Hendrix v. Shery Foster, et al
as 19-17264
Defendant:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, GREGGORY SMITH, R. SPIERS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERY L. FOSTER, ISAAC WINSON, JAMES GREG COX and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX
Vincent Pinder v. Harold Byrnes, et al
as 19-16657
Defendant:
OXBORROW, WAYNE OAKLEY, CURTIS KERNER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT H. PINDER
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDALL D. SCHULTHIES and HAROLD BYRNES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
