Cases 1 - 10 of 16
WOODWARD v. MATLOCK et al
as 1:2024cv05468
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. WOODWARD
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MATLOCK, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BROWN and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
KIRK v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
DEANTHONY KIRK
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS doing business as SCI ALBION, LONNIE OLIVER, PATTY THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Clark v. Weaver et al
as 1:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Mark Clark
Defendant:
J. Weaver, Sgt. John Doe Smouse, Lt. John Doe Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NORTHINGTON v. PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv06338
Defendant:
OFFICER JEFFREY GALAZKA, OFFICER BROWN, OFFICER RICHARD NICOLETTI and others
Plaintiff:
JAMEL NORTHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv01350
Defendant:
OFFICER MICHAEL SPICER, OFFICER THOMAS LICIARDELLO, OFFICER BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doss v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2019cv01789
Defendant:
Warden Lane, Lt. O'Connor, Chaplain Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Doss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Wood v. Detwiler, et al
as 19-1948
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. DETWILER, OFFICER BROWN, of SCI Rockview and OFFICER FOGELMAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS WOOD
SAMPLE v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv00051
Defendant:
OFFICER MICHAEL SPICER, OFFICER THOMAS LICIARDELLO, OFFICER BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SAMPLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKNIGHT v. MOHAMAN et al
as 2:2018cv05487
Defendant:
OFFICER BROWN, SERGEANT ROBINSON, OFFICER MOHAMAN and others
Plaintiff:
LOUIS S. MCKNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
