Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Vachar v. City of Pawtucket et al
as 1:2019cv00430
Defendant:
City of Pawtucket, Officer John Doe, Tina L. Goncalves and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Vachar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Paris v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2018cv40169
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Officers John Doe 1-4, Nathan Reando and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J Paris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Halabi v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2017cv40127
Plaintiff:
Hatem Halabi
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Officer, John Doe #1 and Officer, John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stallworth v. Skerrett et al
as 1:2017cv10405
Defendant:
James Skerrett, David Shulkin, James Tavares and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Stallworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Cottrell v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2015cv10728
Plaintiff:
Surpaul Cottrell
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Parole Board Members Jane and John Doe, Parole Officers John Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace et al v. Cousins et al
as 1:2014cv14767
Plaintiff:
Willie Wallace
Defendant:
Frank Cousins, Michael Marks, Heath Carafa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Budnick v. Ludlow Police Officer John Doe et al
as 3:2013mc93023
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Budnick
Defendant:
Ludlow Police Officer John Doe, Ludlow Police Officer Mary Doe, Ludlow Police Department and others
Budnick v. Ludlow Police Officer John Doe et al
as 3:2013mc93022
Petitioner:
Thomas P. Budnick
Defendant:
Ludlow Police Officer John Doe, Ludlow Police Officer Mary Doe, Ludlow Police Department and others
Joseph et al v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2012cv10191
Defendant:
City of Boston , Edward Davis, III , Office John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Jean Joseph and Marie Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Munyiri v. Trinity EMS, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv11873
Plaintiff:
Mary Munyiri
Defendant:
Trinity EMS, Inc., Trinity EMS Employee 1, Trinity EMS Emplyee 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
