Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Joshua Barlow v. Warden, et al
as 22-12506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA ARLINGTON BARLOW
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, Reidsville State Prison, MS. SHARPE, Unit Manager, Reidsville State Prison, MR. SPIN, Unit Manager, Reidsville State Prison and others
JACKSON v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
QUENTIN M JACKSON and ANTONIO LAMAR MORGAN
Defendant:
Warden J BEASLEY, Unit Manager BRYANT, Lt DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARLOW v. BOBITT et al
as 7:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ARLINGTON BARLOW
Defendant:
Warden BOBITT, Ms SHARPE, Mr SPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. University of Delaware et al
as 1:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
Willie Wright
Defendant:
University of Delaware, Jane Roe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kroft v. Inch et al
as 2:2020cv00396
Defendant:
Colonel Robinson, FNU Noriega, FNU Garmen and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Kroft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adderly v. Robinson et al
as 2:2020cv00184
Defendant:
FNU Peer, FNU Paraschuk, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Elione J. Adderly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Walker v. Arvil Chapman, et al
as 19-5687
Defendant / Appellee:
C. BERNARD, Officer in Charge, LIEUTENANT NEADHAM, JOY TROUDER, ECF Classification Coordinator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID WALKER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00249
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. HAMRICK et al
as 4:2018cv00255
Defendant:
Counselor CHESTER, Warden DWIGHT HAMRICK, Counselor BEACHAM and others
Plaintiff:
SANTWON ANTONIO DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2017cv00445
Plaintiff:
Austin Jay Phillips
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Fairfax County General District Court, Virginia State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
