Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Rodriguez-Ortez v. Blanche
as 26-1822
Petitioner:
MARIA OVILIA RODRIGUEZ-ORTEZ
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General
Mercedes Rodriguez-Ortez v. Todd Blanche
as 26-1858
Petitioner:
MERCEDES ABIGAIL RODRIGUEZ-ORTEZ and VALERIA GUADALUPE CAMPOS-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General
ORTEZ v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04016
Plaintiff:
MARIA ALEJANDRA ORTEZ
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01389
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Toles JR v. Ortez et al
as 1:2026cv03916
Plaintiff:
Darren Laray Toles JR
Defendant:
A. Ortez and Alison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01993
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv04516
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2026cv00148
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Participant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv11212
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ortez v. B Michelle NY Avenue Corp. et al
as 2:2026cv01271
Plaintiff:
Damaris Ortez
Defendant:
Jose Fuentes and B Michelle NY Avenue Corp. doing business as Migueleno Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
