Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Acklin et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00162
Plaintiff:
Robert Vogt, Mario Jackson, Jerry Wilson and others
Defendant:
EMP LSO Holding Corporation and Express Courier International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Love v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2012cv01807
Plaintiff:
Owen Oscar Love
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. North Panola School District et al
as 2:2011cv00251
Plaintiff:
Brandon Brown
Defendant:
North Panola School District , Demond Radcliff , Christopher Harlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Hines v. North Panola School District et al
as 2:2011cv00246
Plaintiff:
Catina Hines
Defendant:
North Panola School District , Demond Radcliff , Christopher Harlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Simmons v. North Panola School District et al
as 2:2011cv00245
Plaintiff:
Untarious Simmons
Defendant:
North Panola School District , Demond Radcliff , Christopher Harlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Coley v. North Panola School District et al
as 2:2011cv00250
Plaintiff:
Gregory Coley
Defendant:
North Panola School District , Demond Radcliff , Christopher Harlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Milam v. North Panola School District et al
as 2:2011cv00249
Plaintiff:
Kizzy Milam
Defendant:
North Panola School District , Demond Radcliff , Christopher Harlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Brooks v. North Panola School District et al
as 2:2011cv00248
Plaintiff:
Akindre Brooks
Defendant:
North Panola School District , Demond Radcliff , Christopher Harlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Hall v. North Panola School District et al
as 2:2011cv00247
Plaintiff:
Dylan Hall
Defendant:
North Panola School District , Demond Radcliff , Christopher Harlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
