Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Cordero v. The Table at Redeye Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cordero
Defendant:
The Table at Redeye Inc., Peter Cecere, Otis Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Peguese v. Otis Worldwide Corporation
as 3:2023cv01363
Plaintiff:
Markia Peguese
Defendant:
Otis Worldwide Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Morales et al v. Big City Foods II, LLC et al
as 8:2021cv01883
Defendant:
Otis Leroy Lonon, Big City Foods II, LLC doing business as California Kitchen Bar & Grill, Lance London and others
Plaintiff:
Gloria Morales and Humberto Constantino Morales
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Calloway et al v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv06975
Plaintiff:
Bridgett Tift, Mary Hanley, James Bloch and others
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Teleholdings, Inc., AT&T, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Otis v. TAH Pizza, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00111
Defendant:
Be Hurd, Inc., Timothy Hurd and TAH Pizza, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jerry Otis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nickelson et al v. Progressive Community Care, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04147
Defendant:
Progressive Community Care Center, LLC and Keyorka Dennis
Plaintiff:
La'Otis Nickelson , Shondreca Sanders , Roylena Humphreys and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216
Post v. United Technologies Corporation et al
as 9:2018cv80294
Plaintiff:
Ryann Post
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation and Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Vanardo v. Taylor Smith Consulting, LLC
as 4:2017cv03291
Plaintiff:
Otis Vanardo
Defendant:
Taylor Smith Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SMITH v. CORTECH, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00734
Plaintiff:
OTIS SMITH
Defendant:
CORTECH, LLC and KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stuart et al
as 1:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Frank Stuart , Jason Adams , Michael Barnes and others
Defendant:
Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
