Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 51
DASKALAKIS et al v. CP INDY DT, LLC D/B/A HYATT REGENCY INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff: Hristos Daskalakis and Kalliope Daskalakis
Defendant: CP Indy DT, LLC, THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION, OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Repasky v. Otis Elevator Company et al
as 3:2023cv00635
Plaintiff: Amanda Repasky
Defendant: Otis Elevator Company and Fred Stickovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
JETTER v. CHAPMAN
as 2:2022cv00060
Plaintiff: OTIS JETTER
Defendant: SARAH CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. FOX 59 et al
as 1:2021cv01962
Plaintiff: OTIS WILLIAMS
Defendant: FOX 59, ALIA BLACKBURN, SHERMAN BURDETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. GOVERNMENT OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv01852
Plaintiff: OTIS WILLIAMS
Defendant: ERIC HOLCOMB and GOVERNMENT OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv01740
Defendant: MARION COUNTY JAIL and STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff: OTIS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv01739
Defendant: MARION COUNTY JAIL, GOVERNMENT AGENCY, WHEELER MISSION and others
Plaintiff: OTIS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILBERT v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv00502
Defendant: ANDREW M SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: OTIS GILBERT, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
YOUNG v. GEO GOUP INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02328
Defendant: NEAL FETZ, TEMPLE, GEO GOUP INC. and others
Plaintiff: OTIS YOUNG, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARR v. GIBSON et al
as 1:2020cv02003
Plaintiff: OTIS CARR
Defendant: JOHN DOE, IDNIANA STATE NOTARY PUBLIC, LIONAL GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?