Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Muslimani et al v. R & P Lucas Underground Utilities, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
Muharam Muslimani , James Brown , Henry Hart, III and others
Defendant:
R & P Lucas Underground Utilities, Inc., Ronnie L. Lucas and Patricia A. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Williams v. Ryan et al
as 5:2014ct03114
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Williams
Defendant:
Irvin Ryan, Jr. and P. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garris v. Ryan et al
as 5:2014ct03083
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johanne Garris
Defendant:
Irvin Ryan, P. Lucas, A. Godfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00816
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Anne Lucas and Joseph P. Lucas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Denise Russell v. Nationwide Life Insurance Comp
as 09-1788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENISE REAGAN RUSSELL, individually and as Executor of the Estate of Daniel Sean Reagan, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONWIDE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
BRENT S. LUCAS and H. P. LUCAS & SONS, INCORPORATED
Jenkins v. Cannon et al
as 0:2009cv00283
Plaintiff:
Congaree B Jenkins
Defendant:
Al Cannon, Mitch P Lucas, Major Hargrove and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jenkins v. Cannon et al
as 0:2009cv00189
Plaintiff:
Congaree B Jenkins
Defendant:
Al Cannon and Mitch P Lucas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Swinton v. Cannon et al
as 2:2009cv00188
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerome Swinton
Defendant:
Al Cannon and Mitch P Lucas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wright v. Cannon et al
as 6:2009cv00169
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Wright
Defendant:
Al Cannon, Mitch P Lucas and FNU Garland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
