Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Schubert v. Avery et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Allan Douglas Schubert
Defendant:
Krystal Avery, Shannon W. Phelps, James Wills and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shaw v. Boulet
as 23-60589
Petitioner / Appellant:
Santiago M. Shaw
Respondent / Appellee:
P. Boulet, Warden
McDuffie v. Boulet
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Harold McDuffie
Defendant:
P. Boulet
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Shaw v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
Santiago M. Shaw
Respondent:
Warden P. Boulet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mendoza v. Boulet
as 22-60045
Petitioner / Appellant:
Elias Mendoza
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Yazoo City Medium and P. Boulet, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Yazoo City Medium
Le v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv00824
Plaintiff:
Kimseing Le
Defendant:
United States of America and Warden P. Boulet
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McLemore v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv00820
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas McLemore
Defendant:
United States of America and Warden P. Boulet
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beahm v. Young et al
as 5:2021cv00547
Plaintiff:
Wayne Allen Beahm
Defendant:
D. L. Young, P. Boulet, B. Fain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. Young et al
as 5:2020cv00579
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Robinson
Defendant:
Christy Meadows, D. L. Young, Erin Stenette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Young et al
as 5:2019cv00910
Defendant:
Mr. Koch, Mr. Jones, Mr. Ball and others
Plaintiff:
Troy T. Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
