Cases 1 - 10 of 156
Clark v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00775
Plaintiff:
Ronald P Clark
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jacobs et al v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv01060
Defendant:
Brandon Dewayne Clark, Mellissa Michelle Carroll, Amanda Carroll and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jacobs and Ruby Handler Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spell v. Springs et al
as 1:2023cv01362
Plaintiff:
Calvin Spell
Defendant:
B. Springs, Nelson, Hawthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Ericson v. Steven Woloszyk, et al
as 23-2527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC ERICSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN R. WOLOSZYK, RICHARD P. CLARK and RICK T. MURAWSKI, also known as RICHARD TULIA MURAWSKI
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv00837
Plaintiff:
Eric P Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Eric Ericson v. Steven Woloszyk, et al
as 23-2146
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC ERICSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN R. WOLOSZYK, RICHARD P. CLARK and RICK T. MURAWSKI, also known as RICHARD TULIA MURAWSKI
Matthew Houston v. L.B.B.S., et al
as 23-15810
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
L.B.B.S., Termed by ECF No. 5, DANIEL SCHWARTZ, CALVIN JOHNSON and others
Eric Ericson v. Steven Woloszyk, et al
as 23-1848
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC ERICSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN R. WOLOSZYK, RICHARD P. CLARK and RICK T. MURAWSKI, also known as RICHARD TULIA MURAWSKI
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03461
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lloyd v. Clarke et al
as 8:2022cv02834
Plaintiff:
Daniel A Lloyd and Daniel A. Lloyd
Defendant:
Drewan P Clarke, Kingz Transport LLC and Drewan P. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
