Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Rowena Simmons v. Baltimore City Police Department
as 24-1019
Plaintiff:
ROWENA SIMMONS, Individually, and on behalf of the Estate of Darius Gore, GARY TYSON and RAYMOND B. HINTON
Defendant:
BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER FELIX TORRES, OFFICER JOHNTA GRAY and others
Russell v. Bogle et al
as 1:2023cv03682
Plaintiff:
Mickey Russell
Defendant:
Michelle Bogle, Kris Bogle, Hasina Javed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Barnes v. Fedele
as 22-35
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Arrello Barnes
Defendant / Appellee:
Fedele, Furman, Correction Officer Robert Murphy and others
Defendant:
M. McGinnis, Napoli, Everette and others
Gunderson v. Corcoran et al
as 1:2021cv04891
Plaintiff:
Sean Gunderson
Defendant:
James P Corcoran, Bill Epperson, Richard Malis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey et al v. Heck et al
as 3:2021cv00211
Plaintiff:
Luna LaToya Bey and Aladdin Moroc Bey
Defendant:
Cynthia M. Heck, Timothy P. Corcoran, Andrew J. Bronsord and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Lawrence v. Corcoran
as 1:2019cv05078
Defendant:
James P Corcoran
Plaintiff:
Denzil Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corcoran v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2018cv21193
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Corcoran
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Owens v. Corcoran et al
as 1:2018cv00334
Plaintiff:
Mark Owens
Defendant:
James P Corcoran, Elgin Mental Health Center (EMHC), Illinois Department of Human Services (IDHS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hurt v. Corcoran et al
as 1:2017cv07909
Plaintiff:
Benahdam Hurt
Defendant:
James P Corcoran, Illinois Department of Human Services, Hasina Javed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Corcoran et al
as 6:2014cv06526
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Young
Defendant:
P. Corcoran, D. Lowe, James Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
