Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Vause v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 5:2026cv00424
Petitioner:
William Vause
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crampton v. City of Henderson et al
as 2:2025cv02392
Plaintiff:
Ervin Jeffery Crampton
Defendant:
City of Henderson and Stephanie Garcia-Vause
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vause v. Davis et al
as 3:2025cv01414
Plaintiff:
Phillip O. Vause, III
Defendant:
Warden D. Davis, Assistant Warden J. McClellan, CS K. Stanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vause v. Davis et al
as 3:2025cv01154
Plaintiff:
Phillip Vause
Defendant:
Warden D. Davis, Assistant Warden J. McClellan, Colonel M. Handley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swartz v. City of Henderson et al
as 2:2025cv01245
Plaintiff:
Amanda Swartz
Defendant:
City of Henderson and Stephanie Garcia-Vause
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles v. Boehm et al
as 4:2025cv00895
Plaintiff:
Brian Victor Charles
Defendant:
Birgit Boehm, Sebastian Mackensen, John Minshew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Corey Vause v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv07666
Defendant:
3M Company, Dupont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Vause
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vause v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv02511
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Vause
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
